Towards More Inclusive Science Communication: a Collective Reflection

At PCST 2025, Liesbeth de Bakker, Clare Boon, Karina Judd and Emma Gill gave linked presentations exploring issues of inclusion in science communication:

  • Liesbeth: Acquiring an EDI-prone mindset in science communication through transformative learning
  • Emma: How do we do inclusion rapidly?
  • Clare: “They have my back”: experiences of queer Australian science communicators
  • Karina: What is inclusive science communication? An international study

During the session, we invited participants to think about what it feels like to practise inclusion honestly; without shortcuts, without perfection and without pretending it’s easy. We gathered their contributions and responses – both verbal and written – and reflect on them here.

Image (16)
Liesbeth, Emma, Clare and Karina getting ready to discuss inclusive science communication at the PCST conference. Photo credit: Emma Gill

Inclusive science communication is rarely neat or comfortable. But participants acknowledged that if we are to do inclusion well, discomfort is an essential companion. Often this discomfort stems from colonialist and western frameworks of knowledge; disrupting our assumptions about what counts as knowledge is essential to building more inclusive practices.

Inclusion is slow and relational; a long-term commitment, not a quick intervention. Inclusive science communication cannot be rushed, particularly when working with marginalised communities. Building relationships means meeting people where they are, choosing language with intention and valuing our different experiences and expertises.  One-off, superficial, tokenistic actions often reinforce exclusion, rather than reducing it.

Image (17)
What does it take to do inclusive science communication? Slide prepared by Emma Gill

We also need to think about where, and with whom, we can initiate change. Change begins with shifting mindsets, recognising nuance and committing to critical reflection; asking who benefits and whose voices are missing from our knowledge and our practice.

Not everyone embraces inclusion. Some participants wanted to think about how we can work with people who reject inclusion and inclusive values or organisations whose response is performative or tokenistic. For those choosing to engage, small steps, shared values and careful framing can create openings for dialogue. Ask rather than assume, listen rather than talk and move at the speed of trust.

The journey to inclusive science communication is neither linear nor easy. But it is a shared journey, undertaken by people who support one another, learn together and hold space to learn from failure and grow from our learning.

Dr Ann Grand

Dr Ann Grand is an Adjunct Associate Professor in Science Communication at UWA and Lead Research Fellow and Policy Analyst at the National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement in the UK. She's been a lecturer with the Open University and the University of the West of England (Bristol), and helps coordinate the Café Scientifique network.

More from The SciComm Collective blog...

Questions? Comments? Leave A Reply Here!

Share your thoughts

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Two white conversation bubbles with a yellow play button in the middle, with the words, "The SciComm Collective" below the logo
A black swan against a brushstrokes of yellow and blue
Swan Cultural Learning by Dr Richard Walley

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge, with respect, the Whadjuk people of the Noongar Nation as the Traditional Custodians of the land on which we work and produce The SciComm Collective, and pay our respects to Elders past and present. We extend our respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

All opinions on this website are representative of individuals and are not representative of The University of Western Australia. The University of Western Australia is not liable for content herein.